I haven't had time to watch the History Channel's "The Bible" mini-series, but I'm aware of the controversy surrounding the character of Satan, who looks suspiciously like President Obama.
I'm not alone in finding that offensive; the Internet is abuzz with outrage over the producers' decision to cast an Obama look-alike as the fallen angel tempting Christ in the desert.
The use of a dark-skinned man to portray an evil entity is just
playing to old, hideous stereotypes. Further, Christians believe that
Satan is a fallen angel who, as an angel, is non-corporeal -- meaning,
not having a body, and certainly not having a body that would look like
ANYONE. I think the Satan-looking-like-Obama issue is not an innocent mistake; I think the producers
were, consciously or not, appealing to vicious stereotypes and the
awareness that they could score points with that part of the Religious
Right that believes Obama to be a sinister, dark, foreign, evil man.
It's bad enough that Jesus, in the series, looks and sounds like a
late-1960s British Invasion pop star -- kind of an odd choice for a
Semitic Jew from Palestine who looked, most likely, just like the
Palestinians living now. Of course, Christians throughout the last two millennia have portrayed Christ as a non-Jewish, Anglo-featured man whose features bespeak, perhaps, the Savior Hans Jesus Nordquist from Oslo. In 2013, I would have hoped that Jesus would have been represented as a man who looks like all of those Middle Eastern men we find so threatening.
Huh. I think I've just discovered why this Jesus looks so . . . well, not like all of those Middle Eastern men we find so threatening.
All in all, I would call this "Biblical epic"
and epic fail.
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment